Like Techgeist? Donate.
Need to Contact Us? Read This. Also, find out more about us on the About page.
Advertisement
Advertisement

Filtering Internet Traffic: A Very Heavy Double-Edged Sword

By Michael Klurfeld on April 22, 2009

 

party-warning

The principle of Net Neutrality is one that to law makers poses a problem: if people can access any content online without any sort of intervention, parts of the internet will fast become virtual black markets. The most talked about material of this sort is child pornography, which governments and those influential on policy around the world purport to be an almost rampant problem online (though to this site’s knowledge, there is no substantial information to support this claim). The latest legislation dealing with child pornography online comes from German, in which the cabinet is seeking to pass a law that would compel ISPs to direct their users away from sites thought to contain child pornography.

Yet even in trying to deter something as detestable as child pornography, the German government faces a potential threat: corruption by its own power. Keeping records of what citizens due is the first step to implementing a police state; history has taught us that much. Yet not logging any sort of information essentially gives individuals a superpowered version of America’s Fourth Amendment, which states that authorities need probable cause or a warrant to make investigations and arrests. 

Redirecting traffic outright is not the right option as the chance that the filtering systems set up by ISPs would work properly is scant at best – it was not so long ago that England blocked Wikipedia due to a bizarre classification. That said, it is definitely a problem that those who do in fact seek out child porn can use the internet as a shield. Unfortunately, having the government install watchdog technology is probably not the best solution.

Share
You can comment either manually filling in your personal information, or you can use your Facebook Account to fill in the information for you. Just click the button below to sign into Facebook.
Have Nothing To Say? Share this article with your friends using one of our share buttons above.

Leave a Comment.

Comments

  1. [...] of net neutrality because we don’t like it when someone tells us what we can and can’t know; our reasoning is mainly political. For Google, or for any other search site, they have to stick with net neutrality for technical [...]

  2. [...] problem is that this is a gateway drug for more limitations on what people can do online. I did a more detailed piece on it a while back, but the idea is that once you have one piece of legislation down making it OK to [...]

  3. [...] problem is that this is a gateway drug for more limitations on what people can do online. I did a more detailed piece on it a while back, but the idea is that once you have one piece of legislation down making it OK to [...]

  4. [...] Why would you want to opt out? Because we have no idea which 7,000 websites have been deemed sources of child porn. The government is keeping the list a secret in hopes that no one will visit it to check it, meaning that there is no way to verify what they deemed child porn is actually child porn. When it comes to net neutrality, the people in charge of blocking sites often get things wrong. [...]

  5. Thank you so much, for sharing the great post!.
    i found a youtube video about watching tv online that I would like to share: international Tv Online
    But seriously, great post and thank you so much !
    I look ahead to your next article !!
    ;)

Leave a Reply