<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why @Techcrunch Writes About Twitter So Damn Much</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techgeist.net/2009/05/why-techcrunch-writes-about-twitter-so-damn-much/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techgeist.net/2009/05/why-techcrunch-writes-about-twitter-so-damn-much/</link>
	<description>Tech of Today, Trends of Tomorrow</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 01:30:17 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: AlexWilhelm &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Mega Blog Showdown: Mashable Takes On Techcrunch - Updated</title>
		<link>http://techgeist.net/2009/05/why-techcrunch-writes-about-twitter-so-damn-much/comment-page-1/#comment-1639</link>
		<dc:creator>AlexWilhelm &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Mega Blog Showdown: Mashable Takes On Techcrunch - Updated</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 15:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techgeist.net/?p=2056#comment-1639</guid>
		<description>[...] I have been critical in the past of TechCrunch on a few occasions, most when Michael Arrington was taking a vacation. That aside, your comments are pointed in the wrong direction. TechCrunch is not a tech site, it is a technology startup and technology corporate blog. Perhaps we both do not always agree with their editorial bent, but we can hardly yell at them too much for being off topic per se. More, it seems that people merely disagree with their content concentrations, something that you Holden, explained well here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I have been critical in the past of TechCrunch on a few occasions, most when Michael Arrington was taking a vacation. That aside, your comments are pointed in the wrong direction. TechCrunch is not a tech site, it is a technology startup and technology corporate blog. Perhaps we both do not always agree with their editorial bent, but we can hardly yell at them too much for being off topic per se. More, it seems that people merely disagree with their content concentrations, something that you Holden, explained well here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Mind of Alex &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Mega Blog Showdown: Mashable Takes On Techcrunch - Updated</title>
		<link>http://techgeist.net/2009/05/why-techcrunch-writes-about-twitter-so-damn-much/comment-page-1/#comment-1571</link>
		<dc:creator>The Mind of Alex &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Mega Blog Showdown: Mashable Takes On Techcrunch - Updated</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 17:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techgeist.net/?p=2056#comment-1571</guid>
		<description>[...] I have been critical in the past of TechCrunch on a few occasions, most when Michael Arrington was taking a vacation. That aside, your comments are pointed in the wrong direction. TechCrunch is not a tech site, it is a technology startup and technology corporate blog. Perhaps we both do not always agree with their editorial bent, but we can hardly yell at them too much for being off topic per se. More, it seems that people merely disagree with their content concentrations, something that you Holden, explained well here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I have been critical in the past of TechCrunch on a few occasions, most when Michael Arrington was taking a vacation. That aside, your comments are pointed in the wrong direction. TechCrunch is not a tech site, it is a technology startup and technology corporate blog. Perhaps we both do not always agree with their editorial bent, but we can hardly yell at them too much for being off topic per se. More, it seems that people merely disagree with their content concentrations, something that you Holden, explained well here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Mind of Alex &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Mega Blog Showdown: Mashable Takes On Techcrunch</title>
		<link>http://techgeist.net/2009/05/why-techcrunch-writes-about-twitter-so-damn-much/comment-page-1/#comment-1570</link>
		<dc:creator>The Mind of Alex &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Mega Blog Showdown: Mashable Takes On Techcrunch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 16:33:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techgeist.net/?p=2056#comment-1570</guid>
		<description>[...] I have been critical in the past of TechCrunch on a few occasions, most when Michael Arrington was taking a vacation. That aside, your comments are pointed in the wrong direction. TechCrunch is not a tech site, it is a technology startup and technology corporate blog. Perhaps we both do not always agree with their editorial bent, but we can hardly yell at them too much for being off topic per se. More, it seems that people merely disagree with their content concentrations, something that you Holden, explained well here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I have been critical in the past of TechCrunch on a few occasions, most when Michael Arrington was taking a vacation. That aside, your comments are pointed in the wrong direction. TechCrunch is not a tech site, it is a technology startup and technology corporate blog. Perhaps we both do not always agree with their editorial bent, but we can hardly yell at them too much for being off topic per se. More, it seems that people merely disagree with their content concentrations, something that you Holden, explained well here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mega Blog Showdown: Mashable Takes On Techcrunch &#124; Techgeist</title>
		<link>http://techgeist.net/2009/05/why-techcrunch-writes-about-twitter-so-damn-much/comment-page-1/#comment-1568</link>
		<dc:creator>Mega Blog Showdown: Mashable Takes On Techcrunch &#124; Techgeist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:54:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techgeist.net/?p=2056#comment-1568</guid>
		<description>[...] I have been critical in the past of TechCrunch on a few occasions, most when Michael Arrington was taking a vacation. That aside, your comments are pointed in the wrong direction. TechCrunch is not a tech site, it is a technology startup and technology corporate blog. Perhaps we both do not always agree with their editorial bent, but we can hardly yell at them too much for being off topic per se. More, it seems that people merely disagree with their content concentrations, something that you Holden, explained well here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I have been critical in the past of TechCrunch on a few occasions, most when Michael Arrington was taking a vacation. That aside, your comments are pointed in the wrong direction. TechCrunch is not a tech site, it is a technology startup and technology corporate blog. Perhaps we both do not always agree with their editorial bent, but we can hardly yell at them too much for being off topic per se. More, it seems that people merely disagree with their content concentrations, something that you Holden, explained well here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Holden Page</title>
		<link>http://techgeist.net/2009/05/why-techcrunch-writes-about-twitter-so-damn-much/comment-page-1/#comment-1286</link>
		<dc:creator>Holden Page</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 16:49:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techgeist.net/?p=2056#comment-1286</guid>
		<description>They have been posting really meaningless posts lately.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They have been posting really meaningless posts lately.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://techgeist.net/2009/05/why-techcrunch-writes-about-twitter-so-damn-much/comment-page-1/#comment-1277</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 23:53:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techgeist.net/?p=2056#comment-1277</guid>
		<description>Pageviews are important but when it comes to posts about Twitter I almost always skip them in Google Reader. Techcrunch has been sliding down hill for a while and they are doing everything they can to ride the Twitter train back up to the top.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pageviews are important but when it comes to posts about Twitter I almost always skip them in Google Reader. Techcrunch has been sliding down hill for a while and they are doing everything they can to ride the Twitter train back up to the top.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Holden Page</title>
		<link>http://techgeist.net/2009/05/why-techcrunch-writes-about-twitter-so-damn-much/comment-page-/#comment-1141</link>
		<dc:creator>Holden Page</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 04:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techgeist.net/?p=2056#comment-1141</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t blame them</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t blame them</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
