Like Techgeist? Donate.
Need to Contact Us? Read This. Also, find out more about us on the About page.
Advertisement
Advertisement

Sprint Gives The iPhone The Good Ole’ Middle

By Holden Page on June 28, 2009

Palm Pre adWho would’ve thought the underdogs Sprint and Palm had it in them?  In a blatant attempt to knock down the Jesus (i)Phone a few notches, Sprint has released a new ad campaign touting the amazing savings you can get buy getting a Pre with Sprint, nearly 1,200 dollars. Take a look at the ad yourself and the rest says it all, but why would Sprint stoop to dissing AT&T and the iPhone directly?

Well, It worked for Apple.

Direct attacks are a great way to stir up some controversy, just look at the witty Mac vs. PC’s commercials. Sure, I might not buy a mac anytime soon (way too expensive) but I will always remember the commercials and how superior they seemingly are. By adding a direct attack to an advertisment means you got some serious leverage over the competition or else you look like a fool. I give ten points to Sprint for well played cockiness and ten points to Palm for allowing them to do so.

Let the true mobile wars begin.

[Click on image to get full advertisement]

Share
You can comment either manually filling in your personal information, or you can use your Facebook Account to fill in the information for you. Just click the button below to sign into Facebook.
Have Nothing To Say? Share this article with your friends using one of our share buttons above.

Leave a Comment.

Comments

  1. If you think Macs are expensive, you aren’t comparing equivalent products. I’m not talking about fit and finish, polish, UI, image, brand, or any of that crap that ignorant Apple-bashers tend to talk about. I’m talking about hardware and software features, specs, and performance.

    • Calm down bud. For what I need a computer to do yes, the macs are too expensive.

      Now that is out of the way if I had the money I would buy a Mac in an instant, I really like them.

      Sheesh, you fan-boys get way to hopped up on silly things.

  2. Mark, even it up, buddy.

    Just because you can construct a ‘comparison’ that looks, at first, to compare apples to apples, and doesn’t doesn’t mean than there aren’t valid comparisons.

    I have an 8 core Mac Pro (8/08) sitting next to a four core i7 home built machine (3/09). Both 64 bit. Both multicore. Both multi-graphics card. Both hardcore machines. Both have approximately the same clock speeds, storage, peripherals, memory and CPU stats (ok, the OC has a hair more RAM and the Mac has 8 cores, not four).

    The price difference is staggering. The Mac Pro, with AppleCare, cost a fortune. The PC cost me something like $2k, maybe $2200k. AND IT OUTPERFORMS THE MAC on most of what I do. Sure, the AppleCare kicks ass, if I ever need it – but when I compare real world productivity between the machines, and they ARE right next to each other, using identical monitos, so I have no oter reason to use one over the other, the PC wins 90% of the time.

    So get off your “Mac’s aren’t expensive in the real world’ comparioson high horse. Of freaking COURSE they are. They’re SUPPOSED to be, Apple knows it, advertisers know it, Marketing knows it, the average non-fanboy knows it, and so should you.

  3. @Chris – Agreed. On all points. Wish I could upmod your comment.

  4. Chis,

    Maybe you should even it up. Comparing the Harpertown to the Nehalem isn’t a fair comparison.

  5. I really think that this blog can help people. Well done :)

Leave a Reply