Like Techgeist? Donate.
Need to Contact Us? Read This. Also, find out more about us on the About page.
Advertisement
Advertisement

Thomas-Rasset Verdict Is Crap

By Michael Klurfeld on June 18, 2009

If you like this post, feel free to Digg.

Jammie Thomas-Rasset, a single mother, had been the target of a long drawn-out RIAA lawsuit, which today concluded by finding Ms. Thomas-Rasset guilty, for a fine of  $1.92 million. Let’s repeat that,  because it’s sort of nuts. This single mother has to pay the record companies one million, nine hundred twenty thousand dollars for downloading 24 songs. That is $1.7 million more than the fine from her previous verdict. Under US law, the penalty for downloading a song illegally is $750 to $150,000, an amount which both legal minds and just any sort of rational person understand to be way too big.

It’s not that a guilty verdict is necessarily incorrect, it’s that the penalty is insane. Piracy does not cost the record company anything. It actually makes the record companies more money. I can understand that they’re not too happy about this, but destroying the lives of the people who are their best customers hardly seems to be an appropriate route.

Update: It looks like the jurors were not properly briefed about what they were doing. Trial number three is almost certainly on its way.

Share
You can comment either manually filling in your personal information, or you can use your Facebook Account to fill in the information for you. Just click the button below to sign into Facebook.
Have Nothing To Say? Share this article with your friends using one of our share buttons above.

Leave a Comment.

Comments

  1. Good god, that is f-ing ridiculous

  2. Holy crap, what’s wrong with that jury??

    That sounds positively vindictive.

  3. [...] of a long drawn-out RIAA lawsuit, which today concluded by finding Ms. Thomas-Rasset guilty, for a. http://techgeist.net/ Copyrights & Campaigns: Capitol v. Jammie Thomas-Rasset: Day 3 … After three years of [...]

  4. [...] we were all pretty outraged when Jammie Thomas-Rasset, a single mother, was fined $1.92 million for downloading 24 songs. The [...]

  5. [...] the poster woman for RIAA abuse, has appealed the recent ruling which said that she was to pay $1.92 million to the RIAA for sharing 24 songs on KaZaa back when people knew what KaZaa was. Her main grounds for appeal is [...]

  6. [...] Jammie Thomas, who earlier this year was fined $1.92 million for sharing songs online, is appealing her most recent verdict on the grounds that the ruling was “arbitrary.” [...]

  7. [...] attorney. And if Joe Shmoe goes to trial and is unfortunate enough to lose, he could be looking a penalty of up to $150,000 per song, which would be far, far worse (though the constitutionality of such nonsensical damages [...]

Leave a Reply