<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter Is Taking Over For RSS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techgeist.net/2009/09/twitter-rss/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techgeist.net/2009/09/twitter-rss/</link>
	<description>Tech of Today, Trends of Tomorrow</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 18:20:52 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bill Greenberg - Good Computer Guy</title>
		<link>http://techgeist.net/2009/09/twitter-rss/comment-page-1/#comment-5383</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Greenberg - Good Computer Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 12:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techgeist.net/?p=5108#comment-5383</guid>
		<description>Um, yeah - I read this because of my RSS reader.  Not Twitter, where it probably would have been buried under all the other crap on there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um, yeah &#8211; I read this because of my RSS reader.  Not Twitter, where it probably would have been buried under all the other crap on there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curt Grymala</title>
		<link>http://techgeist.net/2009/09/twitter-rss/comment-page-1/#comment-5332</link>
		<dc:creator>Curt Grymala</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 23:41:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techgeist.net/?p=5108#comment-5332</guid>
		<description>I simply cannot see Twitter being a replacement for RSS. Twitter is great for discovering new content and new sites, but it just doesn&#039;t cut it for trying to keep track of sites you already follow. 

Let&#039;s say I&#039;m away from the Internet for two days. With RSS, I can easily check out all of the articles I missed from my favorite sites over those two days. However, with Twitter, I have to sift through all of the unnecessary crap, hoping that the site owner tweeted about each post in which I might be interested.

Personally, I&#039;ll stick with RSS for subscriptions and keep Twitter for discovering new things and conversing with people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I simply cannot see Twitter being a replacement for RSS. Twitter is great for discovering new content and new sites, but it just doesn&#8217;t cut it for trying to keep track of sites you already follow. </p>
<p>Let&#8217;s say I&#8217;m away from the Internet for two days. With RSS, I can easily check out all of the articles I missed from my favorite sites over those two days. However, with Twitter, I have to sift through all of the unnecessary crap, hoping that the site owner tweeted about each post in which I might be interested.</p>
<p>Personally, I&#8217;ll stick with RSS for subscriptions and keep Twitter for discovering new things and conversing with people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
